Editor's note: This week, CNN Health's team is taking a close look at the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the Southeast with a series leading up to World AIDS Day on December 1. Learn more about the problem and our upcoming stories here.
Jacksonville, Florida (CNN) -- When the topic of HIV/AIDS enters a conversation, Earl Thompson hears that it's "just what gays get."
"It's not a gay disease," said Thompson. "It's a human disease."
When a person gets a disease like cancer, support pours in, said Thompson, a slender 27-year-old with a boyish face. Family and friends fund raise and make sure their loved one gets proper care. But that's not the case with HIV.
"It's like hush-hush," said Thompson, a Jacksonville native, who learned before his birthday in April that he has HIV. "You feel unlovable. You feel tainted. They're going to point a finger at me and be judging me.
"Just from the community, I know they don't talk about it. Jacksonville has many years before we're close to Miami, Orlando or Tampa. If something goes wrong, you don't talk about it."
It's a problem all across the Bible Belt. The Southeast is disproportionately struck with higher HIV/AIDS rates than much of the rest of the country.
Earl Thompson said HIV/AIDS is kept "hush-hush."
Dealing with the epidemic in the South "is extremely challenging, because the stigma and discrimination is worse," said Dr. Kevin Fenton, director of the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "There is less discourse around prevention, sexual health, comprehensive sex education in schools or having strong, community-based advocacy activities."
Pastor fights HIV stigma in rural town
Jacksonville has the fifth-highest number of AIDS diagnoses among U.S. cities, according to CDC statistics from 2008.
The state says this could have been a statistical aberration because surveillance methods and HIV/AIDS reporting laws changed in Florida in 2007, causing fluctuations in the data.
But local HIV advocates in northeast Florida say the problem is a real one, not just a statistical blip.
"Here in Jacksonville, we're kind of the buckle in the Bible belt," said Donna Fuchs, executive director of Northeast Florida AIDS Network. "HIV carries a huge stigma in our city."
Fuchs said the organization had trouble finding office space in 2000. One property owner refused to rent to the group, saying he didn't want people with AIDS in his buildings.
Today, the office sits on a quiet, tree-lined street with a simple sign that reads: NFAN. A red ribbon, the ubiquitous sign for HIV/AIDS, usually adorns the logo for the organization. But not here.
"Clients didn't want a red ribbon on the door," said Fuchs. "We had to take it down."
Donna Fuchs had trouble finding an office that would rent out to the HIV/AIDS group.
Four blocks away, there is another HIV organization -- one named for NBA star Magic Johnson, who revealed in 1991 that he is HIV-positive.
When that clinic opened a decade ago, the ribbon-cutting ceremony was held inside the lobby. Organizers moved the event indoors because people feared being seen and associated with the disease.
Today, that one-story clinic tucked behind a towering magnolia tree no longer bears Johnson's name.
"The only way we can get people to come through the front door is to create a fictitious name." said Todd Reese, associate director of Health Care Center operations at the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. "No one walks into any building or floor that has any association with HIV."
Although visible HIV signs may be scrubbed from public view, the epidemic has worsened.
HIV cases in Duval County, which mostly consists of Jacksonville, increased by 33% in the first half of 2011. This year, the county Health Department reports an increase in new cases.
"It's really not acceptable," said Dr. Bob Harmon, the county's Health Department director. "This disease is ruining lives, and it's still killing people, especially low-income people who don't get tested enough and who don't get treated early."
Several HIV/AIDS advocates in Jacksonville criticized sex education in schools that emphasized abstinence. The mentality is that HIV/AIDS is not an issue here, several advocates said.
"Denial is the biggest problem," said Reese.
And those who reveal their HIV status struggle to find acceptance.
Thompson observed that some people who knew about his HIV status avoided physical contact with him. In social settings, they watched their drinks to make sure their glasses didn't get mixed up.
"Sometimes you feel like a pin cushion, like you're never going to find acceptance," Thompson said. "You feel like you're going to be looked at as a disease, not as a person."
No one walks into any building or floor that has any association with HIV.
Todd Reese, associate director of Health Care Center operations at the AIDS Healthcare Foundation
What perpetuates the epidemic is a social issue, Reese said.
In Florida, the HIV/AIDS focus has historically been placed in southern part of the state. Some of the earliest HIV cases were found in Miami and in the Haitian immigrant population in South Florida. Miami still struggles with new HIV/AIDS cases; often, it has the highest AIDS rates in the country.
"You can go to Miami and you can put up a billboard, you can talk about condoms, AIDS and sex," Reese said. "You can't do that in Jacksonville. People will be offended. They don't want to talk about it or see it. They don't want to see billboards about it."
And Jacksonville is no small town: It has about 821,000 residents.
It's a different population, said Harmon.
Wade Price said the virus has been ignored.
"In north Florida, our population profile is more like Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi than it is central and south Florida. That generally means higher rates of poverty, lower rates of completing high school and college, and higher percentage of African-American population."
Duval County has a high percentage of African-Americans, and in Jacksonville, 71% of the total HIV cases are African-Americans.
Wade Price, 46, is a black gay man, proud father of three and grandfather of three.
He keeps a half-dozen orange prescription bottles of anti-HIV medications on his nightstand next to his red leather-bound Bible. The pages of his well-worn Bible are patchworks of green and orange highlights. He reads scriptures every night and attends a Baptist church twice a week.
Because his faith is crucial, Price decided to tell the head minister of his church how he struggled with being gay. He wanted to have prayer meetings with ministers and start a church support group.
Price told the minister: "I'm not the only one. Lots of people are keeping quiet, living double lives."
The minister rebuffed him, saying, "Wow, it's times like this, I don't like being a minister."
"That's one aspect of black churches," Price said. "They want to turn blind eyes to it. ... I'm fighting this battle on my own."
Price left that church and found another one last month that is more accepting.
"We pretend it's not happening," Price said. "The virus is being spread. You want to pretend like sex isn't happening. They say, 'Condoms, oh, no! That's not for God!' What's not for God is living with ignorance."
The social climate in northern Florida tends to be more conservative, said Harmon.
Veronica Hicks said things are changing and that more people are paying attention to HIV/AIDS in her community.
"There may be a reluctance to talk about this in the family, in the church, in other social settings and to perhaps ignore it," he said.
But there are signs of change. Churches in the community have started to talk about the HIV/AIDS epidemic, said Veronica Hicks, 50.
Hicks has never felt the need to hide her AIDS diagnosis and told her fellow church members and her pastor.
"They embrace me with it," she said. And Hicks is starting an HIV/AIDS testing and awareness ministry for her church in Jacksonville.
While stigma persists in the community, it's getting better, she said.
She reported seeing growing HIV support groups, increasing turnout at community HIV/AIDS events and a recent line of people waiting to get tested at a mobile clinic.
"It shows me that people are willing to become more educated because HIV is prevalent and relevant."
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Executive Branch - POLITICS Labor Board Facing Possible Shutdown Over Union-Rule Dispute By Judson Berger Published November 29, 2011 Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/29/labor-board-facing-possible-shutdown-over-union-rule-dispute/#ixzz1f8NwfP6e
Members of the National Labor Relations Board are on a collision course ahead of a meeting Wednesday, as the panel's lone Republican member threatens to resign -- a move that would effectively shut down the board and prevent an impending vote on union organizing.
The Republican member, Brian Hayes, is concerned about the vote on changes meant to speed up and simplify union elections. Hayes for weeks has threatened to resign over the vote, according to the Democratic chairman of the board.
If the board were at full membership, this might not be a problem. But the NLRB, which is supposed to have five members, currently has only three. Hayes' resignation would deprive the board of a quorum and in turn disallow it from issuing regulations and rulings.
Even without Hayes' resignation, the board already is careening toward that scenario, with Democratic member Craig Becker's recess appointment set to expire at the end of the year without action by Congress.
The standoff has resulted in a rapid-fire exchange of accusations over the past several weeks. The NLRB is much-loathed by Republicans, who see it as a vehicle for passing pro-union decisions favored by the Obama administration. The independent federal agency is meant to look after and protect the rights of workers to improve their working conditions
Democrats are concerned the entire operation of the NLRB will get caught up in this feud.
Hayes, who has the backing of Republicans in Congress, claims his Democratic colleagues are not giving him enough time to prepare his response on the union-elections proposal. He alleges they initially kept him in the dark about the elections proposal, before offering a "take-it-or-leave-it" deal. Hayes also claims the board is bent on violating the practice of requiring three 'yes' votes to overrule precedent.
"I have substantial doubts about the legal viability of my colleagues' proposed course of action," Hayes wrote in a Nov. 18 letter to Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee.
But Democrats and union officials suggest Hayes is being pressured to step down in order to hamstring the board -- which is a favorite bogeyman among conservatives, particularly in light of an attempt by a board attorney to stop Boeing from opening a production line at a non-union site in South Carolina.
South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and others earlier had suggested Hayes resign.
Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., Kline's Democratic counterpart on the education and workforce committee, last week wrote a letter to Hayes suggesting any move to step down "will be the result of objectionable motives or improper influence." He asked Hayes to provide documents detailing any communication he had with people outside the board about his possible resignation.
"The open calls to resign, followed by the threats you allegedly have made, raise the specter of private requests as well," Miller wrote, describing the situation as "troubling."
"Threatening to shut down the board itself if fellow members make policy choices with which you disagree is, to my knowledge, unprecedented behavior from a member of the board," he wrote.
Asked about the upcoming meeting, a spokesman for Miller said "nobody knows" whether Hayes might follow through on his threats.
NLRB spokeswoman Nancy Cleeland also said the rest of the board is not sure what will happen, though the meeting and vote are still scheduled for Wednesday.
"We're not speculating on what might happen," she told FoxNews.com.
Meanwhile, board Chairman Mark Pearce has rejected Hayes' claims about the proposed rule on union elections. In a Nov. 21 letter to Hayes, Pearce wrote that Hayes had been "fully informed about and invited to participate in" the process. Further, he alleged that Hayes and his staff did not even inquire about the comment-review process until mid-November, a process that entailed sifting through more than 65,000 comments on the proposal. Plus Pearce claimed Hayes had declined to attend recent meetings.
"In short, you have not in any way been excluded from the process of deliberation concerning the proposed rules. Rather, you have refused to assist with that process in any respect and refused to engage in the normal give-and-take of deliberation of a multi-member board," Pearce wrote.
As for Hayes' claim that the vote would require three members, Pearce said that standard does not apply here. He urged Hayes to stay on with the board, and on Tuesday afternoon unveiled what he described as a "limited" proposal on union elections.
Hayes did not return a request for comment Tuesday from FoxNews.com.
Meanwhile, Kline is pushing a bill in Congress that would effectively nullify any attempt by the NLRB to shorten the election process. That bill is expected to hit the House floor Wednesday.
Kline spokesman Brian Newell said the original NLRB proposal could allow aspiring union leaders to hold an election in as few as 10 days, whereas the typical union election now takes more than 30 days to set up.
Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson on Tuesday issued a statement in support of the Kline bill, calling the NLRB proposal a bid to "institute snap elections on behalf of unions, shortening the amount of time businesses will have to make their case to their employees."
Wilson described the NLRB proposal being considered Wednesday as an "abusive power grab by the NRLB."
However, Pearce said Tuesday that the proposal up for consideration Wednesday would only apply to "the minority of elections which are held up by needless litigation" and other disputes. He said those elections typically take more than 100 days to put together. He said other changes to the election process should stay on the table for future consideration.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/29/labor-board-facing-possible-shutdown-over-union-rule-dispute/#ixzz1f8NLrZ6r
The Republican member, Brian Hayes, is concerned about the vote on changes meant to speed up and simplify union elections. Hayes for weeks has threatened to resign over the vote, according to the Democratic chairman of the board.
If the board were at full membership, this might not be a problem. But the NLRB, which is supposed to have five members, currently has only three. Hayes' resignation would deprive the board of a quorum and in turn disallow it from issuing regulations and rulings.
Even without Hayes' resignation, the board already is careening toward that scenario, with Democratic member Craig Becker's recess appointment set to expire at the end of the year without action by Congress.
The standoff has resulted in a rapid-fire exchange of accusations over the past several weeks. The NLRB is much-loathed by Republicans, who see it as a vehicle for passing pro-union decisions favored by the Obama administration. The independent federal agency is meant to look after and protect the rights of workers to improve their working conditions
Democrats are concerned the entire operation of the NLRB will get caught up in this feud.
Hayes, who has the backing of Republicans in Congress, claims his Democratic colleagues are not giving him enough time to prepare his response on the union-elections proposal. He alleges they initially kept him in the dark about the elections proposal, before offering a "take-it-or-leave-it" deal. Hayes also claims the board is bent on violating the practice of requiring three 'yes' votes to overrule precedent.
"I have substantial doubts about the legal viability of my colleagues' proposed course of action," Hayes wrote in a Nov. 18 letter to Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee.
But Democrats and union officials suggest Hayes is being pressured to step down in order to hamstring the board -- which is a favorite bogeyman among conservatives, particularly in light of an attempt by a board attorney to stop Boeing from opening a production line at a non-union site in South Carolina.
South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and others earlier had suggested Hayes resign.
Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., Kline's Democratic counterpart on the education and workforce committee, last week wrote a letter to Hayes suggesting any move to step down "will be the result of objectionable motives or improper influence." He asked Hayes to provide documents detailing any communication he had with people outside the board about his possible resignation.
"The open calls to resign, followed by the threats you allegedly have made, raise the specter of private requests as well," Miller wrote, describing the situation as "troubling."
"Threatening to shut down the board itself if fellow members make policy choices with which you disagree is, to my knowledge, unprecedented behavior from a member of the board," he wrote.
Asked about the upcoming meeting, a spokesman for Miller said "nobody knows" whether Hayes might follow through on his threats.
NLRB spokeswoman Nancy Cleeland also said the rest of the board is not sure what will happen, though the meeting and vote are still scheduled for Wednesday.
"We're not speculating on what might happen," she told FoxNews.com.
Meanwhile, board Chairman Mark Pearce has rejected Hayes' claims about the proposed rule on union elections. In a Nov. 21 letter to Hayes, Pearce wrote that Hayes had been "fully informed about and invited to participate in" the process. Further, he alleged that Hayes and his staff did not even inquire about the comment-review process until mid-November, a process that entailed sifting through more than 65,000 comments on the proposal. Plus Pearce claimed Hayes had declined to attend recent meetings.
"In short, you have not in any way been excluded from the process of deliberation concerning the proposed rules. Rather, you have refused to assist with that process in any respect and refused to engage in the normal give-and-take of deliberation of a multi-member board," Pearce wrote.
As for Hayes' claim that the vote would require three members, Pearce said that standard does not apply here. He urged Hayes to stay on with the board, and on Tuesday afternoon unveiled what he described as a "limited" proposal on union elections.
Hayes did not return a request for comment Tuesday from FoxNews.com.
Meanwhile, Kline is pushing a bill in Congress that would effectively nullify any attempt by the NLRB to shorten the election process. That bill is expected to hit the House floor Wednesday.
Kline spokesman Brian Newell said the original NLRB proposal could allow aspiring union leaders to hold an election in as few as 10 days, whereas the typical union election now takes more than 30 days to set up.
Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson on Tuesday issued a statement in support of the Kline bill, calling the NLRB proposal a bid to "institute snap elections on behalf of unions, shortening the amount of time businesses will have to make their case to their employees."
Wilson described the NLRB proposal being considered Wednesday as an "abusive power grab by the NRLB."
However, Pearce said Tuesday that the proposal up for consideration Wednesday would only apply to "the minority of elections which are held up by needless litigation" and other disputes. He said those elections typically take more than 100 days to put together. He said other changes to the election process should stay on the table for future consideration.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/29/labor-board-facing-possible-shutdown-over-union-rule-dispute/#ixzz1f8NLrZ6r
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



